🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump had a cautionary message for the opposition party.

Soon he will decide what "Democrat agencies" he would cut and whether those cutbacks would be temporary or long-lasting.

He said the government shutdown, which began on Tuesday, had given him an "unique chance."

"Today I'm meeting with the budget director, known for his role in Project 2025," he posted on his Truth Social website on Thursday morning.

Linking to the 2025 Plan

The budget director, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, may not be a household name.

But Project 2025, a right-wing plan for governing put together mostly by former Trump officials like the director when the GOP was not in control, featured prominently during the recent election cycle.

The 900-page policy document contained suggestions for dramatic reductions in the federal bureaucracy, expanded presidential authority, strict border controls, a national prohibition on abortion and other components of an ultra-conservative social agenda.

It was often highlighted by the Democratic candidate Kamala Harris, as what she called a risky proposal for the coming years if he was to be elected.

At the time, seeking to reassure undecided voters, the president attempted to separate himself from the policy document.

"I'm not familiar with Project 2025," Trump wrote in July 2024. "I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some elements are completely unreasonable and abysmal."

Shifting Approach

Now, however, Trump is using the right-wing plan as a threat to get the opposition to accept his spending requirements.

And he is holding up Vought, who authored a chapter on the use of executive power, as a sort of financial grim reaper, prepared to make cuts to federal programs near and dear to Democrats.

To make the point even clearer, on Thursday night the president posted an computer-created spoof video on Truth Social with the director depicted as the grim reaper, accompanied by changed words of Blue Oyster Cult's Don't Fear the Reaper.

Washington Responses

On Capitol Hill, Republican leaders have repeated the president's description of Vought as the White House heavy.

"We have no say over what he's going to do," GOP Senate leader John Thune said. "This represents the danger of shutting down the government and handing the keys to the budget director."

The Utah senator of Utah told the news network that Vought had been "preparing for this moment since puberty."

This might be a bit of an overstatement, but Vought, who cut his teeth as a Capit Hill aide for Republican budget hawks and helped run the advocacy division of the Heritage Foundation, has extensive background digging through the complexities of government spending.

The Numbers Expert in the Administration

He spent a year as the assistant head of the White House budget office during Trump's first term, advancing to become its director in that year.

In contrast to numerous others who worked for the president during those first four years, the director maintained his position - and was promptly reappointed as director of OMB when Trump returned this year.

"Many individuals who didn't come back represent an old way of thinking," said a policy expert, a think tank official who, similar to the director, began his career in conservative congressional budget circles.

"The director was innovative in the first term and perfectly positioned now."

While the director doesn't tend to avoid controversial statements – he previously stated that he hoped to become "the individual who dismantles the bureaucratic establishment" – he doesn't particularly appear the role of conservative villain.

Balding and bespectacled, with a salt-and-pepper facial hair, the director's remarks generally feature the controlled rhythm of a numbers expert or professor.

He doesn't possess the narrow-eyed glower and amped-up rhetoric of Stephen Miller, a different presidential consultant who manages administration border measures.

Capitalizing on Government Closure

Currently the president has warned to deploy the director at a time when, because of the legal limbo created by the federal closure, their reductions could become more extensive and lasting than those implemented previously.

Former House Speaker the political veteran, a veteran of the big shutdown fights of the 1990s, told the media outlet that Vought and his team have been getting ready for exactly these kind of circumstances while they were in the political wilderness during the previous administration.

"Everyone understood a federal closure was possible," he said. "I believe they concluded early on that you're only going to get the scale of change they want if you're very tough and resolute and every chance you get, you take the opportunity."

The advantage the closure offers for spending reducers like Vought is that, lacking legislative authorization, the government is operating in a legal grey area with fewer budgetary restrictions.

The White House can, in theory, cut budgets and personnel more extensively than it could earlier in the year, when spending was governed by baseline appropriation amounts.

And while permanent layoffs would still have to abide by a two-month warning, the director could begin the countdown when he, and Trump, so choose.

Present Measures and Coming Conflicts

Vought already has announced major infrastructure projects in New York City and the midwestern metropolis are on hold, citing the need for a review of questionable employment policies - a review that he said cannot occur during the shutdown.

He's also cancelled nearly $8bn in renewable energy initiatives across 16 states, each supporting Harris, the president's rival, in last year's presidential race.

Democrats and federal worker unions have vowed to challenge these cuts in court and claimed that the president is issuing largely empty threats to try to pressure them into giving up their opposition.

Many economists have pointed out that the White House reductions have been accompanied by other deficit-ballooning policies, which could undercut their attacks on Democrats for being the party of fiscal irresponsibility.

"The GOP is raising expenditures in different sectors and cutting taxes at the same time," an economics professor, an economics professor at the prestigious institution noted.

"The idea that they're committed to fiscal prudence is not supported by their actions."

Political Risks

Certain GOP legislators have expressed concern that the apparent glee with which the president is promoting director-mandated reductions could alienate voters if the shutdown stretches on.

Republicans have been warning of the dire consequences of the shutdown on government services - as part of a strategy to portray Democrats as the ones to blame.

Engaging in this while celebrating the new ways the administration is slashing programmes could derail those efforts.

"The director is less politically aware than the president," South Dakota Senator Kevin Cramer, a member of the "Doge caucus", told the news website Semafor.

"We, as Republicans have never had so much ethical advantage on a spending measure in our lives… I don't understand why we would waste it, which represents the danger of employing presidential authority in this moment."

The North Carolina senator, a legislator who has chosen not to run for re-election next year, warns that government representatives "must exercise caution" in how they announce additional reductions.

The Doge-directed layoffs and programme cuts were mostly disliked, according to polling data, causing a drag on the president's approval ratings.

A repetition of this now perilous.

As the expert stated, though, the White House, and Vought, may view the long-term benefits as well worth the short-term challenges.

"For Russ, for myself, for anyone working on fiscal matters, the nation faces financial crisis,"