🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy worked, and shared new appeals had originated from mediators to restart talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Route

Araghchi is walking a challenging path since Iran wishes not to be seen to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Concluded

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president claiming the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries used their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the talks that American atomic experts could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials stated repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in some form if discussions restart.

The American leader recently claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving clear proposals from America either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the concept of international law, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He said the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and cooperation, making trust hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always attempted to enforce their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the primary resolution to address conflicts, but its requirements, rules and tenets must be followed."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the battle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but did not succeed to destroy. The Iranian people have become more resilient, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the wake of this assault."